Sabiston Ch52 — Rectal Cancer Surgery

Citation: Galandiuk S, Netz U, Morpurgo E, Tosato SM, Abu-Freha N, Ellis CT. Chapter 52: Colon and Rectum. In: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 21st ed. Elsevier; pp. 1378–1389 (this chunk).

Source type: Textbook chapter — reference source, not a primary study. See Sabiston Ch52 - Diverticular Disease, Obstruction & Pseudo-Obstruction for the general note on how this chapter is used in the wiki.

This is chunk 5 of the chapter (chunk 1: diverticular disease/obstruction/Ogilvie syndrome; chunk 2: IBD; chunk 3: infectious/ischemic colitis; chunk 4: colorectal neoplasia/colon cancer surgery). Chunk 6 (the last one) will cover Pelvic Floor Disorders and Constipation, which this chunk overlaps into by a page or two while finishing rectal cancer content.

Scope of this chunk

Pages 1378–1389: preoperative evaluation and staging of rectal cancer, local excision, the history/rationale behind TME and preoperative chemoradiation, low anterior resection, sphincter- sparing surgery, transanal TME, abdominoperineal resection, special circumstances (synchronous cancers, short residual colon), anastomotic and other surgical complications, low anterior resection syndrome, and postoperative surveillance/adjuvant chemotherapy by stage.

Filing

Relevance

This chunk connects several previously-separate threads in the wiki: the existing Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) concept page (from the Boublikova review) now has surgical and staging context to sit alongside; the Colorectal Cancer Staging (TNM) page gets its rectal- specific staging modalities (ERUS/MRI); and the previously-stubbed Rectal Cancer page becomes a real synthesis page rather than a TNT-only placeholder. As with prior chunks, none of the specific figures (survival percentages, complication rates, chemotherapy trial results like the IDEA duration analysis) are independently verified against primary literature here — the adjuvant chemotherapy section in particular summarizes several specific trials (FOLFOX/CAPOX duration, Bockelman meta-analysis) that would be worth ingesting directly if a specific treatment decision is on the line.